Not known Details About h4831 vs h4831sc
Not known Details About h4831 vs h4831sc
Blog Article
This is certainly speculated to be the "drop by" powder-or darn close to it- for nearly any bottle-necked cartridge one particular could handload. It is the inspiration for lots of pet loads, yet I have not been content with the results.
I've made use of H4831 (and H4831SC), And that i utilize it. There are not numerous cartridges which i utilize it for as I feel generally to gravitate to other powders. On the other hand, I can't declare that it will not perform. It is simply that Various other powders perform better for any given cartridge. For illustration, while in the 280, H4831 gave me excellent velocity and really great groups with Nosler a hundred and forty AB. Even so, RL19 was marginally better in accuracy, while the velocity was just about identical.
It is most likely that no further discussion is necessary, during which case we advocate starting off a fresh thread. If even so you are feeling your response is needed you may even now do so.
Warning applying SC or SSC produced loads with very long cut, again off and perform up. Use Risk-free loading approaches.
My knowledge would be that the SC and SSC loaded to the identical excess weight as the extensive cut displays a lowered velocity.
Apache Jct Very good facts, I have jars of both and normally questioned if they might be reloaded Along with the identical recipes should I run out of one or the other.
Hodgdon H4831SC (Shorter Minimize) extruded rifle propellant is usually a prime choice for huge recreation hunters who use handloader rifles. Launched inside the fifties, this propellant has long been enhanced with shorter grain sizes which lets much better powder movement and a lot more uniformity.
Although this is most likely legitimate, there is a good deal additional to it than just not blowing on your own up. He couldn't hit prairie pet h4831 vs h4831sc dogs outside of about one hundred fifty yards, so I am guessing that inconsistent combustion was not performing something favorable for his grouping capacity with These loads.
I could stack em in one hole but I wasn’t content with the velocity. After months, I got lucky and caught some H1000 on the web and of course paid a bit excess. The pretty future 7 days at a gun display a guy experienced an entire situation of H1000 for $40 per 1lb. I neglect just how much, but with the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a mild load.
It truly is humorous how over the years h4831 vs h4831sc loading a great number of various cartridges in many alternative rifles that I haven't gained appropriate conclude benefits with H-4831 or the shorter-Slice Variation.
As for your 4831 vs 4831SC, they are precisely h4831sc the same/equivalent powder cept for grain dimensions. Load data is interchangeable.
Like Everybody said, the SC means “quick Reduce” and it is a bit simpler to meter. Makes you issue why they might even now make the typical a single.
Am i able to presume that H4831 can be substituted for H4831sc ? I do know the Bodily variation but will it impact the burn off or velocity? I do think not but I'm not one hundred% sure.
IMR4831 and H4831SC are unique. Wherever there's a chance you're puzzling it and thinking that it can be close is H4831 and H4831SC are really related. These two are practically precisely the same except H4831SC is manufactured to smaller grains so it meters much easier.